Fisher Zucker Franchise Law Firm visit our corporate site  |   about us  |   contact us




LAW PRACTICE AREAS

Franchise & Distribution
  Contract Negotiation
  Day to Day Franchise Advice
  Franchisee Termination
  Franchise Real Estate
  Franchise Bankruptcy
  Regulatory Compliance
  International Franchising
  Mergers and Acquisitions
  Starting A Franchise Business

Trademark Registration
Business Transactions
Dispute Resolution
Training Programs

FRANCHISE SALES REFERENCES
  Compliance with Disclosure Laws
  Misrepresentations & Omisions
  Earnings Claims
  Negotiated Changes
  State Relationship Laws
  Sell Only to Qualified Candidates
  Developing a Compliance Program


Attorney Directory
Legal News
Recruitment
Site Map


Contact Us

Philadelphia, PA - 215.545.5200

Cherry Hill, NJ - 856.665.5253

Brunswick, GA - 912.264.4211

Email firm@fisherzucker.com

Visit our corporate site

Manufacturers Beware: Is Your New Jersey Distributor Really a Franchisee?

Can a manufacturer legally terminate a New Jersey exclusive distributor for legitimate business purposes? This was the issue before a New Jersey federal court in Atlantic City Coin & Slot Service Company, Inc. v. IGT, decided this summer.

In IGT, the Court preliminarily enjoined a slot machine manufacturer from terminating an exclusive distributorship agreement with a New Jersey distributor. In seeking the injunction, the plaintiff relied upon the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act, which prohibits termination of a franchise agreement except for good cause (the Act defines "good cause" as the failure of the franchisee substantially to comply with the requirements of the franchise agreement). The plaintiff had successfully demonstrated that the distributorship had been terminated not for performance reasons, but because the manufacturer desired to sell slot machines to New Jersey casinos directly. The issue to be determined, therefore, was whether the distributor relationship constituted a franchise under the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act.

Applying the "community of interest" test enunciated by the New Jersey Supreme Court in Instructional Sys., Inc. v. Computer Curriculum Corp., the court found that the distributor may be entitled to protection under the Franchise Practices Act because it had made numerous franchise-specific investments (including office facilities, specialized computers to demonstrate software and programs, promotional products, signs bearing the manufacturer’s name, computer upgrades and inventories) which were necessary given the nature of the business relationship. Because the distributor relationship had "sufficient hallmarks" of a "community of interest," and because the distributorship had been terminated without good cause, the court held that the distributor had demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits on its Franchise Practices Act claim.

In light of this expansive interpretation of what constitutes a franchise under the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act, manufacturers should ensure, before attempting to terminate any New Jersey distributor, that the distributorship is not entitled to the statutory protections afforded by the Franchise Practices Act.

Back to News Article Listing


F I S H E R Z U C K E R
Franchise Law / Business Lawyers

121 Avenue of the Arts, Suite 1200, Philadelphia, PA 19107
215.545.5200

402 Park Boulevard, Cherry Hill, NJ 08002
856.665.5253

777 Gloucester Street, Suite 411, Brunswick, GA 31520
912.264.4211

Copyright 2004 - Fisher and Zucker